In this Article
Everyone talks about AI models — their architectures, parameters, and performance benchmarks. Far fewer talk about the part that determines whether those models succeed or fail: the data.
Collecting data for AI training sounds straightforward in theory. Gather large volumes. Clean them. Feed them into the pipeline. Repeat. Yet in practice, even experienced teams find themselves circling back to the same issues. Among the most common ones are unstable access, biased samples, or datasets that look impressive in size but collapse under real-world variability.
Data collection mistakes surface later when accuracy begins to erode for reasons no one can trace. And by then, the cost of fixing the foundation is far higher than building it correctly in the first place.
Types of data used in AI training
Data isn’t one-size-fits-all.
Some datasets are highly organized and structured. They’re often arranged in tables or spreadsheets as transaction records, CRM exports, and financial logs. This is the kind of data that models can process well because its structure is predictable.
Then there’s unstructured data. No fixed format. No tidy columns. Think text documents, images, audio files, and social media posts. It’s messy, context-heavy, and often far more reflective of the real world. Training on this type of data requires additional preprocessing and interpretation.
In the middle of both of them, there’s flexible semi-structured data. For example, JSON responses, HTML pages, and API outputs. They follow patterns, yet those patterns aren’t rigidly tabular. For many AI pipelines, this is where large-scale data collection actually happens.
Modern data quality issues: lack of accuracy
How do you build a learning model? First, you train it. That’s why the richness of data means a lot.
Teams often focus on model architecture before asking a simpler question: Where does the data actually come from? Web scraping. APIs — reliable, but sometimes expensive. Surveys. Public repositories like Kaggle. Internal databases. Logs. User interactions. The sources are everywhere.
However, obtaining data is not the same as obtaining the right data. Inaccurate data is one of the most persistent issues in modern AI systems. These are small distortions that weaken the dataset. Add duplicate records, outdated entries, or mislabeled samples, and the model begins learning from noise instead of signal. Even worse, data silos, which are isolated collections of information that don’t communicate across systems, prevent teams from seeing the full picture.
Poor data collection processes introduce bias or missing values from the start. Automated pipelines can mislabel data at scale if something breaks upstream. Manual data entry — still surprisingly common — introduces human error. Over time, even clean data decays. If updates don’t propagate across systems, yesterday’s accurate record becomes today’s outdated liability.
When data is collected thoughtfully, results improve regardless of industry. In pharma research, AI systems became more reliable once experimental data and failed trials were included, not just successful lab results. Learning from “negative” outcomes makes models more resilient and accurate.
Chronic blunders in AI data collection
1. Volume over vitality
The classic mistake teams make is choosing quantity over quality. Bigger datasets look impressive, but high-signal data is what actually improves models. Another issue? Not refreshing datasets. Without active learning loops, models slowly degrade.
2. Training only for the “Happy End”
Teams optimize for clean, standard scenarios. If a self-driving system never sees rare events, it won’t know how to react when they happen.
3. Hidden bias
Bias usually starts earlier than teams expect. The moment you decide what to collect, which sources to rely on, you’re already shaping how the model will see the world. If certain groups, scenarios, or edge cases are missing, the model won’t compensate for that gap. It will simply learn the dominant patterns and treat them as the norm.
4. Too much synthetic data
Synthetic data is useful. But when AI starts training mostly on AI-generated outputs, nuance fades. Over time, models risk what’s often called model collapse — outputs become repetitive and artificial.
5. Legal oversight
Many teams forget to document where their data came from. Scraped datasets without a clear audit trail can shut projects down during compliance reviews. In regulated environments, that’s not a small mistake.
Target leakage in AI systems: why does it happen?
Leakage happens when a model gains access to information it wouldn’t realistically have at the moment of prediction. The most obvious example is the inclusion of future data. Accuracy may seem flawless, but in production, the model collapses because that information simply isn’t available.
Cross-validation mistakes are another kind of problem. Regular K-fold validation works fine when all data points are independent. But if your data has a time order or grouped relationships like sessions or users, K-fold can accidentally put the same or related information into both training and test sets. The evaluation remains technically correct, yet practically misleading.
Even subtle process changes can introduce leakage. Adjusting labeling logic, modifying evaluation datasets mid-project, or failing to control validation drift can distort performance metrics.
Leakage makes models look better than they are, and that’s precisely the danger.
Find and Fix
Data collection is tricky. It’s vital to spot the mistakes before they introduce instability. Knowing how to fix them appropriately makes all the difference.
Tips to Find:
- Pay attention to every feature. Ask yourself: Would this really be available when the model makes predictions? If not, it’s a problem.
- Check for duplicates, gaps, and odd entries. Repeated or missing data can make your project fail.
- Analyze distributions. Sudden spikes or empty regions are warning signs.
- Review the pipeline. Make sure transformations haven’t accidentally leaked information across training and test sets.
- Watch your metrics. Unexpected jumps in performance often hide hidden mistakes.
Tips to Fix:
- Choose the right splits. Time-based for anything temporal, grouped for users, sessions, or entities. Always split your data before applying transformations.
- Refresh data regularly. Use active learning loops or continuous updates.
- Address bias. Make sure no group, scenario, or edge case is ignored.
- Validate synthetic data. Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) review keeps artificial data realistic and relevant.
- Document everything. Track where data comes from, when it was collected, and what was done to it.
- Use proxies when needed. They stabilize your data, simulate real conditions, and prevent overlaps or repeats.
Find the mistakes early, fix them carefully, and your AI will actually learn what it’s supposed to.
Related Articles
- Building a web scraper with ChatGPT and Python
- AI-powered predictive campaigns: are they worth the hype?
- Business and productivity AI tools to try in 2026
- Gemini 3, the most intelligent AI model, or not really?
- The power of large language models
